Regular to Premium Fuel Re-program - Jeep Commander Forums: Jeep Commander Forum
Programmers/Engine Mods Questions or advice about programmers or engine mods? This is the place...

 1Likes
  • 1 Post By consumedbywater
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 09-01-2013, 04:02 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Points: 6,782, Level: 54 Points: 6,782, Level: 54 Points: 6,782, Level: 54
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Nitemare3219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 389
Regular to Premium Fuel Re-program

I'm considering switching my programmer to premium fuel in my V6. It has 134,000 miles on it right now.

I'm wondering if there is potential for better mileage, power, or both, especially if I manage to get ethanol-free fuel since it's the lesser used premium grade. It's only going to cost me 10 cents more than regular at my local Speedway due to a promo, so I figure I'll try it.

Anyone see a potential problem with this?

Black 2006 3.7 Sport

RC Lift & 2.2 Series Shocks | Hypertech Programmer | General Grabber AT² on Ultra Mavericks | Magnaflow Exhaust | 6000k HIDs | Complete LED conversion | K&N CAI | Stubby antennae | Bull Bar | Chrome
Nitemare3219 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 09-27-2017, 01:00 AM
Super Moderator
Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91
Level up: 26% Level up: 26% Level up: 26%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
Big Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: East Coast of Florida
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2008
Trim Package: Sport
Power-Train: 4.7L V-8
4WD
If 4WD - system: QT-II
Current Mileage: 102,100
Posts: 5,076
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitemare3219 View Post
I'm considering switching my programmer to premium fuel in my V6. It has 134,000 miles on it right now.

I'm wondering if there is potential for better mileage, power, or both, especially if I manage to get ethanol-free fuel since it's the lesser used premium grade. It's only going to cost me 10 cents more than regular at my local Speedway due to a promo, so I figure I'll try it.

Anyone see a potential problem with this?
I don't see any issues with this;

You may even see a slight improvement in your MPGs.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Big Blue is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 09-28-2017, 01:47 PM
Senior Member
Points: 3,984, Level: 40 Points: 3,984, Level: 40 Points: 3,984, Level: 40
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
BadJuju's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Pacifica, CA
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2006
Trim Package: Sport
Power-Train: 4.7L V-8
4WD
If 4WD - system: QT-II
Current Mileage: 120,000
Posts: 336
Garage
Would this work with the V8 as well? All in for some better MPG's haha
BadJuju is offline  
 
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 09-29-2017, 04:51 AM
Super Moderator
Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91
Level up: 26% Level up: 26% Level up: 26%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
Big Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: East Coast of Florida
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2008
Trim Package: Sport
Power-Train: 4.7L V-8
4WD
If 4WD - system: QT-II
Current Mileage: 102,100
Posts: 5,076
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by jopina7807 View Post
Would this work with the V8 as well? All in for some better MPG's haha
In theory it should.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Big Blue is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 10-01-2017, 06:33 PM
Senior Member
Points: 6,596, Level: 53 Points: 6,596, Level: 53 Points: 6,596, Level: 53
Level up: 23% Level up: 23% Level up: 23%
Activity: 17% Activity: 17% Activity: 17%
 
consumedbywater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2006
Trim Package: Limited
Power-Train: 5.7L V-8 Hemi
4WD
If 4WD - system: QD-II
Current Mileage: 175,000
Posts: 473
Garage
I've played with reprogramming on mine with the Superchips 3872. I found that while there were slight power gains on 91 octane, the mileage gains weren't enough to justify the extra cost. A good 87 tune should be able to net you around the same mileage and close to the same performance.
Jerry'sXK likes this.

2006 XK Limited, Hemi, QDII
245/70R17 General Grabber AT2s
Ported/Polished Throttle Body
Flowmaster Super 44
Stock Height Again (For Now)
consumedbywater is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 10-06-2017, 09:31 AM
Super Moderator
Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91
Level up: 26% Level up: 26% Level up: 26%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
Big Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: East Coast of Florida
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2008
Trim Package: Sport
Power-Train: 4.7L V-8
4WD
If 4WD - system: QT-II
Current Mileage: 102,100
Posts: 5,076
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by consumedbywater View Post
I've played with reprogramming on mine with the Superchips 3872. I found that while there were slight power gains on 91 octane, the mileage gains weren't enough to justify the extra cost. A good 87 tune should be able to net you around the same mileage and close to the same performance.
I have the Superchips (3874) F5 Flashpaq Tuner and I have the 93 octane performance tune loaded.

You can probably get close to the same mileage with a good 87 octane tune if your really dig deep and tweak some of the individual settings & shift points.

I can tell you definitively, you will not get anywhere close to the same performance of the 93 octane performance tune - with any 87 octane tune.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Big Blue; 10-08-2017 at 09:18 PM.
Big Blue is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 10:36 PM
Senior Member
Points: 6,596, Level: 53 Points: 6,596, Level: 53 Points: 6,596, Level: 53
Level up: 23% Level up: 23% Level up: 23%
Activity: 17% Activity: 17% Activity: 17%
 
consumedbywater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2006
Trim Package: Limited
Power-Train: 5.7L V-8 Hemi
4WD
If 4WD - system: QD-II
Current Mileage: 175,000
Posts: 473
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Blue View Post
I have the Superchips (3874) F5 Flashpaq Tuner and I have the 93 octane performance tune loaded.

You can probably get close to the same mileage with a good 87 octane tune if your really dig deep and tweak some of the individual settings & shift points.

I can tell you definitively, you will not get anywhere close to the same performance of the 93 octane performance tune - with any 87 octane tune.
I can believe that with 93. Here in California, all I can get is 91, and there wasn't much difference between the 87 performance and 91 performance tune. I ran a lot of tests with the three non-towing tunes that came on mine, which were 87 eco, 87 performance, and 91 performance. 87 eco ran the best mileage numbers on mine, and killed all power, but the two performance tunes were nearly identical for me.

Of course, the difference likely comes down to our motors. There isn't much power to be gained out of these early Hemis without some major modifications or custom tunes. I've done a lot of playing and haven't seen any major gains out of anything I've done to it.

2006 XK Limited, Hemi, QDII
245/70R17 General Grabber AT2s
Ported/Polished Throttle Body
Flowmaster Super 44
Stock Height Again (For Now)
consumedbywater is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 11:02 PM
Senior Member
Points: 4,057, Level: 40 Points: 4,057, Level: 40 Points: 4,057, Level: 40
Level up: 54% Level up: 54% Level up: 54%
Activity: 29% Activity: 29% Activity: 29%
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Monterey California
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2006
Trim Package: Limited
Power-Train: 5.7L V-8 Hemi
4WD
If 4WD - system: QD-II
Current Mileage: 124000
Posts: 186
I have the flashpaq tuner for my 5.7 Hemi Commander. I tried the 93? tune but did not at all like the way the throttle at low speed became so very sensitive. Definitely not what you want when crawling slowly off road. Most vehicles that are tuned for higher octane will get worse fuel economy when running lower than recommended octane fuels as the engine management system monitors the knock sensors and retards the ignition timing and injection timing to prevent engine detonation with lower octane fuels. This does not hurt anything at all but performance is less and fuel economy will suffer slightly, It really isn't a huge difference. I run the 87 octane tune with my flashpaq tuner. Has little more performance than stock but regarding fuel economy, I have not been able to see a difference compared to the stock tune. With electronic engine management and injection systems making any changes with free flowing exhausts or intakes usually does not equate to much better performance or fuel economy as the system monitors the oxygen sensors, knock sensors and adjusts the mixture and timing to compensate for more free flowing intake and exhaust. Rarely if ever this will translate into better fuel economy as the engine requires the proper fuel mixture to run correctly.
bdalameda is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 10-08-2017, 09:15 PM
Super Moderator
Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91 Points: 20,980, Level: 91
Level up: 26% Level up: 26% Level up: 26%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
Big Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: East Coast of Florida
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2008
Trim Package: Sport
Power-Train: 4.7L V-8
4WD
If 4WD - system: QT-II
Current Mileage: 102,100
Posts: 5,076
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdalameda View Post
I have the flashpaq tuner for my 5.7 Hemi Commander. I tried the 93? tune but did not at all like the way the throttle at low speed became so very sensitive. Definitely not what you want when crawling slowly off road.
I use the 93 Octane tune for normal everyday driving.

If I'm towing, I program in the towing tune.

If I'm off-roading/trail riding I'll re-program it back to stock.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Big Blue; 10-08-2017 at 09:20 PM.
Big Blue is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 10-10-2017, 11:11 PM
Senior Member
Points: 13,805, Level: 76 Points: 13,805, Level: 76 Points: 13,805, Level: 76
Level up: 39% Level up: 39% Level up: 39%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Own a Commander?: Yes
Model year: 2010
Trim Package: Sport
Power-Train: 5.7L V-8 Hemi
4WD
If 4WD - system: QT-II
Current Mileage: 180000
Posts: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdalameda View Post
I have the flashpaq tuner for my 5.7 Hemi Commander. I tried the 93? tune but did not at all like the way the throttle at low speed became so very sensitive. Definitely not what you want when crawling slowly off road. Most vehicles that are tuned for higher octane will get worse fuel economy when running lower than recommended octane fuels as the engine management system monitors the knock sensors and retards the ignition timing and injection timing to prevent engine detonation with lower octane fuels. This does not hurt anything at all but performance is less and fuel economy will suffer slightly, It really isn't a huge difference. I run the 87 octane tune with my flashpaq tuner. Has little more performance than stock but regarding fuel economy, I have not been able to see a difference compared to the stock tune. With electronic engine management and injection systems making any changes with free flowing exhausts or intakes usually does not equate to much better performance or fuel economy as the system monitors the oxygen sensors, knock sensors and adjusts the mixture and timing to compensate for more free flowing intake and exhaust. Rarely if ever this will translate into better fuel economy as the engine requires the proper fuel mixture to run correctly.
I have the diablo intune which allows you to make the throttle more or less sensitive in 1% inc. ... I ussually run at +17%, anything over 20 messes with driveability, but in your case you could go negative.

To the OP, with 170,000 miles, I use the premium tune.... runs much better. Stock tune has surge issues. Don't use the premium tune with regular fuel or it will knock under heavy acceleration or load.

2010 5.7 QTII -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, Gas Tank Skid Mod,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, 1.5" SpiderTrax, General Grabber AT 265/70/17,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, Custom Tow Rings F/
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
thance is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Jeep Commander Forums: Jeep Commander Forum > Jeep Commander Discussion > Performance Modifications > Programmers/Engine Mods

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Commander Forums: Jeep Commander Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome