3.7L or 4.8L which one to buy? - Jeep Commander Forums: Jeep Commander Forum
General Commander Discussion General Discussion involving the Jeep Commander goes here. If it does not fit into a more specific category below, post it here.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-27-2012, 06:13 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
Points: 4, Level: 1 Points: 4, Level: 1 Points: 4, Level: 1
Level up: 7% Level up: 7% Level up: 7%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Cool 3.7L or 4.8L which one to buy?

My first jeep was a 78 cj7 and it was great. The wife and I have had a minivan for the past 9 years and we are ready to get another Jeep and like the Commander. I have read many reviews, mostly good, a few horror stories about the Commander, but I know that is to be expected with any Make and Model. We tow at most a 1000lb tent trailer and typically have kids in the 3rd row seat. We want a Sport because we dont need all the fancy gadgets or the Hemi and w want to stay within budget. My question is do you go with the 3.7 6cyl or the 4.7 8cyl. Keep in mind we don't tow much and never will and are looking to get the best fuel economy we can, but realize we are buying a Commander and not a Prius. Any recommendations would be appreciated.
fishba1989 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-27-2012, 08:27 PM
Senior Member
Points: 2,179, Level: 28 Points: 2,179, Level: 28 Points: 2,179, Level: 28
Level up: 20% Level up: 20% Level up: 20%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 130
I was asking the same question about 3 weeks ago and ended up with a 2006 4.7.

Initially I though "Hey, the v6 is clearly going to be more fuel efficient!" but after doing some research and using some common sense I came to the conclusion that the V6 is not very suitable for such a heavy vehicle and requires more power/gas to get it moving. The V8 is more fitting because it is a more powerful engine. It takes less strain to get moving...

I checked a popular fuel efficiency website and the average MPG of both models was actually the same (15mpg), so that tells ya something! The site is http://www.fueleconomy.gov

Love my commander though. The price of mpg sucks no matter which way you go, but its worth it for such a kick ass little beast imo.
Dirty_Walter is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-27-2012, 08:57 PM
Member
Points: 357, Level: 7 Points: 357, Level: 7 Points: 357, Level: 7
Level up: 14% Level up: 14% Level up: 14%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty_Walter View Post
I was asking the same question about 3 weeks ago and ended up with a 2006 4.7.

Initially I though "Hey, the v6 is clearly going to be more fuel efficient!" but after doing some research and using some common sense I came to the conclusion that the V6 is not very suitable for such a heavy vehicle and requires more power/gas to get it moving. The V8 is more fitting because it is a more powerful engine. It takes less strain to get moving...

I checked a popular fuel efficiency website and the average MPG of both models was actually the same (15mpg), so that tells ya something! The site is http://www.fueleconomy.gov

Love my commander though. The price of mpg sucks no matter which way you go, but its worth it for such a kick ass little beast imo.
^This.

I'd be looking at one of the V8's. If you're planning on doing that kind of towing, even occasionally, I'd look to the hemi. I wouldn't even consider the V6 if I was you.

2006 Commander Limited 4.7L
Frank_Drebin1 is offline  
 
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-27-2012, 09:14 PM
Senior Member
Points: 2,179, Level: 28 Points: 2,179, Level: 28 Points: 2,179, Level: 28
Level up: 20% Level up: 20% Level up: 20%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 130
I initially wanted the V6. Test drove a few and liked them. I have no need for a ton of power or speed/pick up... But I found a very good deal on my 4.7, did some research and some math and just decided it was a good choice.

Other than the crappy mpg (crappy either way), I love the thing.
Dirty_Walter is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-27-2012, 09:43 PM
Senior Member
Points: 5,186, Level: 46 Points: 5,186, Level: 46 Points: 5,186, Level: 46
Level up: 18% Level up: 18% Level up: 18%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
xjtrailrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 451
I say get the 5.7 Hemi. Plenty of reserve power and I still get 16 mixed, average 13 in town and I have seen 20 on the highway on flat land. I have yet to find the power limit to the 5.7 and outrunning sports/muscle cars is kind of fun in a Jeep!
xjtrailrider is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-27-2012, 11:26 PM
Senior Member
Points: 4,967, Level: 45 Points: 4,967, Level: 45 Points: 4,967, Level: 45
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
rjhj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario.
Posts: 471
My 06 hemi is stock and I've seen 22 on highway and mixed average is about 17 now. And I never reset my mpgs


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
rjhj is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-28-2012, 10:10 AM
Senior Member
Points: 4,033, Level: 40 Points: 4,033, Level: 40 Points: 4,033, Level: 40
Level up: 42% Level up: 42% Level up: 42%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
DetroitMarauder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 392
I've got the 3.7, no complaints but I should have gone 4.7. Since speed doesn't matter they both get pretty much the same MPG. Plus, since you're towing go with the 4.7. Even though it's only 1000 lbs. and the 3.7 can handle that you may end up upgrading what you're towing in the future.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DetroitMarauder is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-28-2012, 01:08 PM
Senior Member
Points: 4,379, Level: 42 Points: 4,379, Level: 42 Points: 4,379, Level: 42
Level up: 15% Level up: 15% Level up: 15%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 329
I like the 2006 or 2007 4.7 V8. Either year, that engine has 8 spark plugs. From 2008, the engine has more horsepower, but 16 plugs. I'm thinking simple is best. Good luck!

2007 Jeep Commander 4X4, 4.7, Steel Blue
2003 Ford Thunderbird, White, Black Top w/ Port Holes
BADOS is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 06-29-2012, 07:15 AM
Senior Member
Points: 4,720, Level: 43 Points: 4,720, Level: 43 Points: 4,720, Level: 43
Level up: 85% Level up: 85% Level up: 85%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
ScorpionCrawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty_Walter View Post
I was asking the same question about 3 weeks ago and ended up with a 2006 4.7.

Initially I though "Hey, the v6 is clearly going to be more fuel efficient!" but after doing some research and using some common sense I came to the conclusion that the V6 is not very suitable for such a heavy vehicle and requires more power/gas to get it moving. The V8 is more fitting because it is a more powerful engine. It takes less strain to get moving...

I checked a popular fuel efficiency website and the average MPG of both models was actually the same (15mpg), so that tells ya something! The site is http://www.fueleconomy.gov

Love my commander though. The price of mpg sucks no matter which way you go, but its worth it for such a kick ass little beast imo.

I don't think you will find many 3.7 owners that would do things differently for the ENGINE.
Probably more so for the 4X system QT I, QTII or QDI.
This coming from a 3.7 owner that has driven his for what is just touching 141,000 miles. Not owned one for 3 weeks.
The statment above that the 3.7 is not very suitable is way off base.
I would have no problem towing anything within the manufactures recomended specifications and along with that comes the maintenace.
If I was towing long distances over 1000 miles I would look into additional trans cooling. The 3.7 only has the electric cooling fan.
The engineers at Mercedes are smart enough to figure out what drivetrain to put next to the 3.7 to get her rolling. I don't run the 1/4 mile with it and I'm not heavy on the gas pedal.
As far as I'm concerned they got it right.
On another note I previously had a Ford F150 4X4 with a 6cyl in it. I retired it with 238,000 miles on it.
Not because of drivetrain issues but the rear gas tank leaked, air bag light came on and it needed tires.
I think the engineers at Ford also got this right.
As far as mileage is concerned they are not all the same! I average 19.6 off highway. My communte to work is 22 miles of 2 lane country roads with speed limits of between 35 and 45 mph only 4 stop lights.
As far as highway mileage is concerned the best I ever got was from Mineapolis to Rapid City SD at 25mpg. Generally it is around 21mpg highway.
Mileage will always depend on how you drive, where you live and road conditions.
Keep the 3.7 around 2100 rpm for the best possible mileage on the highway.
My XK has been to, thru and in 43 of the lower 48 states. July 19th it leaves fully loaded for Az and Nevada. Another 4000 + mile road trip.
Now if I was to buy another XK it would be a different 4x system. Probably QTII which was availble in 06 with the 3.7 as a option but you won't find many of them.
I would do this for the off road capabilities. I have taken my XK off road with the longest adventure 68 miles in Moab. I ended up renting a modified unlimited wrangler while I was there because I didn't want to bust mine up knowing I had a 1,700 mile drive to get home.The only thing I won't do with QTI is MUD.... Commander Chaos an older member, worked his 3.7 QTI hard off road and I'm not remembering him having many problems.

On the 3.7 you can expect to change the water pump at around 80,000 miles.

My advice to you is buy the commander that suits your needs off and on road. Buy one that you can afford and afford to maintan. Doing the reuired maintence is key to a long happy life.
ScorpionCrawler is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Jeep Commander Forums: Jeep Commander Forum > Jeep Commander Discussion > General Commander Discussion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep Commander Forums: Jeep Commander Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome