Jeep Commander Forum banner

Modified OME

1 reading
25K views 29 replies 9 participants last post by  consumedbywater  
#1 ·
After running a Crown (Rough Country equivalent) lift for a year, and finding its limits while off roading, I decided it was time to upgrade. I initially planned to go for OME HD springs alone, but after trying them out and seeing no additional height over the spacer lift, so I decided to go for a modified OME. I didn't go for OME shocks, instead using Bilstein 4600 stock struts up front and Monroe F-150 Load Levelling shocks in the rear.

Here's where I was at before, with the spacer lift. Ball joint angles were pretty bad, so I decided to go for JBA UCAs as well. For a modified OME, that's an absolutely necessary upgrade.

Image


Image


The OME springs are around 1" taller than stock, and each have one extra coil. They're also slightly thicker, contributing to a higher spring rate.

Image


Image


The JBA UCAs are significantly more beefy than stock, and the ball joints also have significantly more travel. They're also replaceable with the same ball joints that many 1/2 ton Chevys in the 90s came with, so if you need to you can get replacements at any auto parts store.

Image


The OME springs alone put me at 21" hub to fender up front, and 22" hub to fender in the rear, almost exactly what I had using the Crown lift before. The ride was much improved, but I really wanted the extra height to clear my larger tires.

So I set about modifying the Crown lift to stack on top of the OME springs. In the rear, there were no problems. Stacking the spacers onto the springs left me at 23.5" hub to fender, and after notching the gas tank skid plate to allow the control arm to drop further, everything worked well. I removed the rear sway bar since with HD springs and Monroe load levelling shocks, my rear end was plenty stiff enough.

Up front, I had a much harder time. First I tried to just stack the spacers on, and encountered major problems. I sat at 24.5" hub to fender, where the UCAs contacted the spring. Without the UCAs connected, the shocks extended to 25", where the tie rod ends maxed out. The suspension was completely ruined, with no downward travel. I wanted to end up at 23" up front, which is the height most WK forums recommend as the maximum height. So I decided to trim the Crown spacer down.

I started by separating the top strut mount, hammering the bolts out. I used deep sockets around the bolts to give them room to fall through, and used a hammer to pound them out. With the bolts removed the strut mounts separated into two pieces.

Image


Next, I cut apart the Crown spacer and cut out the bolts. I carefully cut the spacer apart right at the weld on one side, so I would have an easier time welding everything back together later.

Image


Next, I trimmed down the metal tabs to shorten the spacer. I did some careful measuring and decided to trim each tab down to 1/2", leaving me at a 7/8" thick spacer overall.

Image


Next, I bolted the spacers and strut mounts together to form a single unit, and welded everything together. I also added 3" long 1/2" diameter grade 8 bolts since the original bolts wouldn't be long enough. I welded them to the strut mounts so they wouldn't spin when I reinstalled everything.

Image


After reassembling the entire front end, I ended up at exactly 23" hub to fender up front, and 23.5" hub to fender in the rear.

Image


During this project, I also replaced my lower ball joints, inner and outer tie rod ends, and half shafts since at 170k miles they were all pretty worn out and the CV boots were torn. I plan to rebuild the half shafts with new grease and new boots so that I have a spare set, but the front end angles don't look too bad. Unfortunately, I don't have any pictures of the angles at the moment, but I'll be sure to take some later and add them.

I've hosted a set of full size pictures and descriptions here, with some additional images as well detailing some other parts of the installation.
 
#4 ·
Up front, I had a much harder time. First I tried to just stack the spacers on, and encountered major problems. I sat at 24.5" hub to fender, where the UCAs contacted the spring. Without the UCAs connected, the shocks extended to 25", where the tie rod ends maxed out. The suspension was completely ruined, with no downward travel. I wanted to end up at 23" up front,

SO you only have 1.5" of droop? That is a bummer. Thats the major reason for running a superlift at running anything more then an OME lift height.

Otherwise looks like you did a great job on the work and the writeup! RIde height looks real good.
 
#5 ·
SO you only have 1.5" of droop? That is a bummer. Thats the major reason for running a superlift at running anything more then an OME lift height.

Otherwise looks like you did a great job on the work and the writeup! RIde height looks real good.
An alignment did affect my strut angles slightly, and my new tie rod ends do allow a larger range of motion, so with my current setup, my droop is limited by the strut anyway. I haven't measured the exact amount of droop I have now, but I more or less have the suspension travel of an OME lift, with the space to clear 33s comfortably.

I don't know the specifics of a Superlift since I haven't been able to closely examine one, but I believe that since it uses a 4" spacer on top of the stock strut setup, you essentially get factory travel. This means that the Superlift will have more droop than me, since an OME lift utilizes springs to extend the strut further at ride height, but not as much compression, since the strut will be more compressed with stock springs at ride height.

Compression is much more important to me since in most situations, it'll lower the center of gravity much more than droop. I won't be able to keep all 4 wheels on the ground as often, but given that I've also added a roof basket and the XK is pretty top heavy anyway, I'd much rather have less rollover risk than full traction. The best of both worlds would involve a coilover setup with the Superlift cradle drop, but that's pretty far out of my price range right now.
 
#8 ·
Nice work. Please report back on ride quality. For anyone looking to do this that doesn't already have a crown or rc lift to work with I would recommend 2 3/8 spacers. They are solid plate 3/8 thick... No cutting welding required.
 
#10 ·
Ride quality is much firmer than stock. I ran the OME by itself for a few days before modifying it, and the ride is the same modified as unmodified.

Personally, I prefer the firmer ride since it feels much more stable around corners and more connected to the road. However, it doesn't absorb bumps nearly as well as the stock suspension and there's a lot of jostling around on rough roads.

3/8 spacers are an excellent option to avoid cutting and welding. The stock strut mount bolts still won't be long enough, so they'll have to be replaced. I imagine that with a little drilling, lug studs would make an excellent press-in option. It's also worth noting that while I needed 7/8" to reach 23" hub to fender, I have the Hemi and around 200 lbs of extra weight in/above the cabin, so my springs have much more load on them. I've seen WKs with the Hemi use only 1/2" of extra spacers to reach the same 23" hub to fender, so I'd advise trying out one spacer first before trying to add a second one.

What tie rod ends are you using, and how much extra travel are you getting?
I'm using Moog Problem Solver inner tie rod ends (PN: EV800467) and ACDelco Professional outer tie rod ends (PN: 45A1036/45A1037). I didn't measure travel beforehand, so I can't say exactly how much extra travel I'm getting, but I'd estimate I have around 2.5" of droop and 4" of compression up front.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombler
#12 ·
None except price. Both ACDelco and Moog outers are greasable and high quality products, so ultimately it came down to being able to get the ACDelco parts for around $15 less. After receiving the ACDelco parts, they physically look very similar to the Moogs as well, including an apparent change in design to a castle nut instead of lock nut and hex-end ball joint. If the price difference hadn't been so significant, I probably would've gone for Moog outers.
 
#21 ·
I've just realised that I may have messed up my OME order.

I've seen that they do 2 different strut types:

The Nitrocharger - Strut N188S & the N190 rear shock
&
The Nitrocharger Sport (Firmer valved shock) - strut N219S & rear shock N220

I've ordered the firmer valved ones thinking that was the HD setup, but when i go on JBA they suggest using the N188S & the N190 rear shocks and i saw a comment that @kolak made on Jeep Forum, "The firmer valved struts and shocks were released some years after the original ones. I would only consider using them for exceptionally laden vehicles"

I think maybe I’ve made an error and have ordered the too highly valued shocks which will mean that my ride will be a lot harsher and not as forgiving.

When anyone has purchased the HD setup, which shocks have you gone for?

Any help would be really really appreciated. Thanks
 
#22 ·
I've just realised that I may have messed up my OME order.

I've seen that they do 2 different strut types:

The Nitrocharger - Strut N188S & the N190 rear shock
&
The Nitrocharger Sport (Firmer valved shock) - strut N219S & rear shock N220

I've ordered the firmer valved ones thinking that was the HD setup, but when i go on JBA they suggest using the N188S & the N190 rear shocks and i saw a comment that @kolak made on Jeep Forum, "The firmer valved struts and shocks were released some years after the original ones. I would only consider using them for exceptionally laden vehicles"

I think maybe I’ve made an error and have ordered the too highly valued shocks which will mean that my ride will be a lot harsher and not as forgiving.

When anyone has purchased the HD setup, which shocks have you gone for?

Any help would be really really appreciated. Thanks
I don't think you'll have any problems with too firm of a ride. When you consider that OME designed their suspensions for the WK, even a stock XK adds plenty of weight to warrant the HD setup.
 
#23 ·
After running a Crown (Rough Country equivalent) lift for a year, and finding its limits while off roading, I decided it was time to upgrade. I initially planned to go for OME HD springs alone, but after trying them out and seeing no additional height over the spacer lift, so I decided to go for a modified OME. I didn't go for OME shocks, instead using Bilstein 4600 stock struts up front and Monroe F-150 Load Levelling shocks in the rear.

Here's where I was at before, with the spacer lift. Ball joint angles were pretty bad, so I decided to go for JBA UCAs as well. For a modified OME, that's an absolutely necessary upgrade.

Image


Image


here, with some additional images as well detailing some other parts of the installation.
Hey cbw, so what size and make wheels you rocking in this photo?
 
#24 ·
After running a Crown (Rough Country equivalent) lift for a year, and finding its limits while off roading, I decided it was time to upgrade. I initially planned to go for OME HD springs alone, but after trying them out and seeing no additional height over the spacer lift, so I decided to go for a modified OME. I didn't go for OME shocks, instead using Bilstein 4600 stock struts up front and Monroe F-150 Load Levelling shocks in the rear.

Here's where I was at before, with the spacer lift. Ball joint angles were pretty bad, so I decided to go for JBA UCAs as well. For a modified OME, that's an absolutely necessary upgrade.

Image


Image


here, with some additional images as well detailing some other parts of the installation.
Hey cbw Yeah going to give them a try..

so what size and make wheels you rocking in this photo?
 
#25 ·
his garage says "247/70R17 General Grabber AT2s mounted on factory wheels"


but not sure on the 247? maybe 245?
 
#26 ·
his garage says "247/70R17 General Grabber AT2s mounted on factory wheels"

but not sure on the 247? maybe 245?
Seems like a bug in the forums. That number changes randomly, right now its at 246 for me. But yes, it should be a 245.

However, in these photos I'm on a different set of wheels and tires. These are a set of 265/70R18s on Jeep WK2 wheels. With my spacers, the wheels are sitting at about 5.2" of backspacing. The tires stand 32.6" tall, about the same height as a 285/70R17.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luckyse7ens